GPU Comparison

Select up to 2 GPUs to analyze their pricing, performance, and specifications side-by-side.

Quick Verdict

On raw speed the Radeon R9 390 comes out significantly faster β€” about 33% ahead of the GeForce GTX TITAN. It also wins on performance-per-dollar, making it the cleaner choice when you can afford it.

Maximum Capacity Reached. Remove a model to add another. (2/2)

VS
AMD
Radeon R9 390
Price
€36
Perf Index
8%
Value Score
0.222
VRAM8GB GDDR5
Thermal TDP275W
Price
€1,198
Perf Index
6%
Value Score
0.005
VRAM6GB GDDR5
Thermal TDP230W

Radeon R9 390 vs GeForce GTX TITAN: In-Depth Breakdown

Performance: Radeon R9 390 vs GeForce GTX TITAN

The Radeon R9 390 is significantly faster, around 33% ahead of the GeForce GTX TITAN. Both cards sit in the same broad class, well suited to entry-level 1080p.

Price & Value

The Radeon R9 390 currently lists from $36 EUR, $1,162 EUR less than the GeForce GTX TITAN at $1,198 EUR. Because it's both faster and competitively priced, the Radeon R9 390 wins on performance-per-dollar by about 4331%. The Radeon R9 390 is trading below its $329 EUR MSRP β€” a genuine deal. The GeForce GTX TITAN still sits about $199 EUR above its $999 EUR MSRP.

Power & Efficiency

On power, the GeForce GTX TITAN is the gentler choice at 230W versus 275W. The Radeon R9 390 is more efficient per watt because it's faster, but its higher 275W draw means more heat and a bigger PSU. Its more modern GCN 2.0 architecture on a TSMC 28nm process is part of why it does more with each watt.

VRAM & Future-Proofing

The Radeon R9 390 carries 8GB versus 6GB on the GeForce GTX TITAN. The extra 2GB helps at 4K, with high-resolution texture packs, and for content-creation or local-AI workloads that exhaust smaller buffers.

Generation & Longevity

The Radeon R9 390 is roughly 2 years newer than the GeForce GTX TITAN (GCN 2.0 vs Kepler), so it generally benefits from a more modern architecture and longer driver-support runway.

Features & Ecosystem

Beyond raw numbers, the Radeon R9 390 brings AMD FSR upscaling and strong rasterization value, while the GeForce GTX TITAN offers NVIDIA DLSS upscaling/frame generation and stronger ray tracing. If you lean on upscaling or ray tracing, that ecosystem difference can matter as much as the frame-rate gap.

Which should you buy: Radeon R9 390 or GeForce GTX TITAN?

The Radeon R9 390 is the all-round winner here β€” it's faster and the better value, so buy it if it fits your budget. Only consider the GeForce GTX TITAN if you find it at a steep discount.

Frequently Asked Questions

Is the Radeon R9 390 better than the GeForce GTX TITAN?

The Radeon R9 390 is significantly faster, roughly 33% ahead. If your budget allows, it's the stronger pick.

Which is better for 4K gaming, the Radeon R9 390 or the GeForce GTX TITAN?

Neither is a dedicated 4K card; both are best at entry-level 1080p. For 4K you'd want a faster GPU, or lean on upscaling.

Is the GeForce GTX TITAN worth the extra $1,162 EUR over the Radeon R9 390?

Only if you need the extra performance or features; on pure value the Radeon R9 390 comes out ahead.

Does the Radeon R9 390 have enough VRAM advantage to matter?

Its 8GB (vs 6GB) gives real headroom for 4K, heavy texture mods, and creative/AI work. At 1080p the gap matters less.