GPU Comparison
Select up to 2 GPUs to analyze their pricing, performance, and specifications side-by-side.
The GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER is dramatically faster than the Radeon RX 6400, leading by roughly 43% in our performance index.
Maximum Capacity Reached. Remove a model to add another. (2/2)
GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER vs Radeon RX 6400: In-Depth Breakdown
Performance: GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER vs Radeon RX 6400
The GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER is dramatically faster, around 43% ahead of the Radeon RX 6400. Both cards sit in the same broad class, well suited to entry-level 1080p.
Power & Efficiency
The Radeon RX 6400 draws just 53W versus 100W for the GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER, and it also delivers more performance per watt — so it runs cooler and quieter and needs less PSU headroom. Its more modern RDNA 2 architecture on a TSMC N6 process is part of why it does more with each watt.
Generation & Longevity
The Radeon RX 6400 is roughly 3 years newer than the GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER (RDNA 2 vs Turing), so it generally benefits from a more modern architecture and longer driver-support runway.
Features & Ecosystem
Beyond raw numbers, the Radeon RX 6400 brings AMD FSR upscaling and strong rasterization value, while the GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER offers NVIDIA DLSS upscaling/frame generation and stronger ray tracing. If you lean on upscaling or ray tracing, that ecosystem difference can matter as much as the frame-rate gap.
Which should you buy: Radeon RX 6400 or GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER?
The GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER is the faster card by about 43%. With live pricing limited for this pair, base your decision on the spec differences above — particularly VRAM and power draw — and check current stock before buying.