GPU Comparison

Select up to 2 GPUs to analyze their pricing, performance, and specifications side-by-side.

Quick Verdict

On raw speed the GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER comes out significantly faster β€” about 25% ahead of the Radeon R9 390. But the Radeon R9 390 is the better value, undercutting it by $744 EUR for the performance you get.

Maximum Capacity Reached. Remove a model to add another. (2/2)

VS
AMD
Radeon R9 390
Price
€36
Perf Index
8%
Value Score
0.222
VRAM8GB GDDR5
Thermal TDP275W
Price
€780
Perf Index
10%
Value Score
0.013
VRAM4GB GDDR6
Thermal TDP100W

GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER vs Radeon R9 390: In-Depth Breakdown

Performance: GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER vs Radeon R9 390

The GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER is significantly faster, around 25% ahead of the Radeon R9 390. Both cards sit in the same broad class, well suited to entry-level 1080p.

Price & Value

The Radeon R9 390 currently lists from $36 EUR, $744 EUR less than the GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER at $780 EUR. Despite being slower, the Radeon R9 390 offers the better performance-per-dollar (~1632% better value), so budget-focused buyers should weigh it carefully. The Radeon R9 390 is trading below its $329 EUR MSRP β€” a genuine deal. The GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER still sits about $621 EUR above its $159 EUR MSRP.

Power & Efficiency

At 100W against 275W, the GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER is both the lower-power and the more efficient card, making it the easier build to cool and power. Its more modern Turing architecture on a TSMC 12nm process is part of why it does more with each watt.

VRAM & Future-Proofing

The Radeon R9 390 carries 8GB versus 4GB on the GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER. The extra 4GB helps at 4K, with high-resolution texture packs, and for content-creation or local-AI workloads that exhaust smaller buffers.

Generation & Longevity

The GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER is roughly 4 years newer than the Radeon R9 390 (Turing vs GCN 2.0), so it generally benefits from a more modern architecture and longer driver-support runway.

Features & Ecosystem

Beyond raw numbers, the Radeon R9 390 brings AMD FSR upscaling and strong rasterization value, while the GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER offers NVIDIA DLSS upscaling/frame generation and stronger ray tracing. If you lean on upscaling or ray tracing, that ecosystem difference can matter as much as the frame-rate gap.

Which should you buy: Radeon R9 390 or GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER?

Choose the GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER if you want the most performance and can absorb the higher price. If you're optimizing for value, the Radeon R9 390 stretches your money further for only slightly lower performance.

Frequently Asked Questions

Is the GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER better than the Radeon R9 390?

The GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER is significantly faster, roughly 25% ahead. The Radeon R9 390 is still worth it if value matters more than top-end frames.

Which is better for 4K gaming, the Radeon R9 390 or the GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER?

Neither is a dedicated 4K card; both are best at entry-level 1080p. For 4K you'd want a faster GPU, or lean on upscaling.

Is the GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER worth the extra $744 EUR over the Radeon R9 390?

Only if you need the extra performance or features; on pure value the Radeon R9 390 comes out ahead.

Does the Radeon R9 390 have enough VRAM advantage to matter?

Its 8GB (vs 4GB) gives real headroom for 4K, heavy texture mods, and creative/AI work. At 1080p the gap matters less.