Skip to content

GPU Comparison

Select up to 2 GPUs to analyze their pricing, performance, and specifications side-by-side.

Market Value Leader

Only verified data for GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER is available. Benchmarks for other models are currently being processed.

Quick Verdict

On raw speed the GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER comes out noticeably faster — about 13% ahead of the Intel Arc A370M. The GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER is the cheaper option by $1,073 EUR.

Maximum Capacity Reached. Remove a model to add another. (2/2)

VS
NVIDIA
GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER
Price
€782
Performance
9/100
VRAM
4 GB GDDR6
Key Specs Advantage
+100% Memory Bus (128-bit vs 64-bit)
+71% Bandwidth (192 GB/s vs 112 GB/s)
+25% CUDA Cores (1,280 vs 1,024)
Price
€1,854
Performance
8/100
VRAM
4 GB GDDR6
Key Specs Advantage
+19% Boost Clock (2,050 MHz vs 1,725 MHz)

GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER vs Intel Arc A370M: In-Depth Breakdown

Performance: GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER vs Intel Arc A370M

The GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER is noticeably faster, around 13% ahead of the Intel Arc A370M. Both cards sit in the same broad class, well suited to entry-level 1080p.

Price & Value

The GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER currently lists from $782 EUR, $1,073 EUR less than the Intel Arc A370M at $1,854 EUR. The GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER still sits about $623 EUR above its $159 EUR MSRP.

Power & Efficiency

At 50W against 100W, the Intel Arc A370M is both the lower-power and the more efficient card, making it the easier build to cool and power. Its more modern Alchemist architecture on a TSMC N6 process is part of why it does more with each watt.

Generation & Longevity

The Intel Arc A370M is roughly 3 years newer than the GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER (Alchemist vs Turing), so it generally benefits from a more modern architecture and longer driver-support runway.

Features & Ecosystem

Beyond raw numbers, the GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER brings NVIDIA DLSS upscaling/frame generation and stronger ray tracing, while the Intel Arc A370M offers Intel XeSS upscaling and AV1 encoding. If you lean on upscaling or ray tracing, that ecosystem difference can matter as much as the frame-rate gap.

Which should you buy: GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER or Intel Arc A370M?

The GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER is the faster card by about 13%. With live pricing limited for this pair, base your decision on the spec differences above — particularly VRAM and power draw — and check current stock before buying.

Frequently Asked Questions

Is the GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER better than the Intel Arc A370M?

The GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER is noticeably faster, roughly 13% ahead. If your budget allows, it's the stronger pick.

Which is better for 4K gaming, the GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER or the Intel Arc A370M?

Neither is a dedicated 4K card; both are best at entry-level 1080p. For 4K you'd want a faster GPU, or lean on upscaling.

Is the Intel Arc A370M worth the extra $1,073 EUR over the GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER?

Only if you need the extra performance or features; on pure value the GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER comes out ahead.

Technical Specifications Comparison

Architecture & Cores

SpecificationGeForce GTX 1650 SUPERIntel Arc A370M
ArchitectureTuringAlchemist
Process NodeTSMC 12nmTSMC N6
CUDA Cores (CUDA Cores / Shading Units)1,2801,024
Ray Tracing Cores8
Tensor / AI Cores128

Clock Speeds

SpecificationGeForce GTX 1650 SUPERIntel Arc A370M
Base Clock1,530 MHz1,550 MHz
Boost Clock1,725 MHz2,050 MHz

Memory

SpecificationGeForce GTX 1650 SUPERIntel Arc A370M
VRAM Capacity4 GB4 GB
Memory TypeGDDR6GDDR6
Memory Bus128-bit64-bit
Memory Speed12 Gbps14 Gbps
Bandwidth192 GB/s112 GB/s

Connectivity & Power

SpecificationGeForce GTX 1650 SUPERIntel Arc A370M
InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16PCIe 4.0 x8
TDP100 W50 W
Power Connectors1x 6-pinNone
ReleasedNov 2019Mar 2022