GPU Comparison
Select up to 2 GPUs to analyze their pricing, performance, and specifications side-by-side.
The GeForce GTX 1050 Ti is dramatically faster than the Radeon R7 360, leading by roughly 300% in our performance index. The Radeon R7 360, however, delivers more performance per dollar — $122 EUR cheaper.
Maximum Capacity Reached. Remove a model to add another. (2/2)
GeForce GTX 1050 Ti vs Radeon R7 360: In-Depth Breakdown
Performance: GeForce GTX 1050 Ti vs Radeon R7 360
The GeForce GTX 1050 Ti is dramatically faster, around 300% ahead of the Radeon R7 360. Both cards sit in the same broad class, well suited to entry-level 1080p.
Price & Value
Right now the Radeon R7 360 starts at $26 EUR against $148 EUR for the GeForce GTX 1050 Ti. Despite being slower, the Radeon R7 360 offers the better performance-per-dollar (~45% better value), so budget-focused buyers should weigh it carefully. The Radeon R7 360 is trading below its $109 EUR MSRP — a genuine deal.
Power & Efficiency
The GeForce GTX 1050 Ti draws just 75W versus 100W for the Radeon R7 360, and it also delivers more performance per watt — so it runs cooler and quieter and needs less PSU headroom. Its more modern Pascal architecture on a Samsung 14nm process is part of why it does more with each watt.
VRAM & Future-Proofing
With 4GB against 2GB, the GeForce GTX 1050 Ti has more headroom for 4K textures and memory-hungry creative/AI tasks where the Radeon R7 360's 2GB can fall short.
Features & Ecosystem
Beyond raw numbers, the GeForce GTX 1050 Ti brings NVIDIA DLSS upscaling/frame generation and stronger ray tracing, while the Radeon R7 360 offers AMD FSR upscaling and strong rasterization value. If you lean on upscaling or ray tracing, that ecosystem difference can matter as much as the frame-rate gap.
Which should you buy: GeForce GTX 1050 Ti or Radeon R7 360?
Choose the GeForce GTX 1050 Ti if you want the most performance and can absorb the higher price. If you're optimizing for value, the Radeon R7 360 stretches your money further for only slightly lower performance.