GPU Comparison
Select up to 2 GPUs to analyze their pricing, performance, and specifications side-by-side.
The GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER is noticeably faster than the Arc A380, leading by roughly 11% in our performance index.
Maximum Capacity Reached. Remove a model to add another. (2/2)
GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER vs Arc A380: In-Depth Breakdown
Performance: GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER vs Arc A380
The GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER is noticeably faster, around 11% ahead of the Arc A380. Both cards sit in the same broad class, well suited to entry-level 1080p.
Power & Efficiency
The Arc A380 draws just 75W versus 100W for the GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER, and it also delivers more performance per watt — so it runs cooler and quieter and needs less PSU headroom. Its more modern Alchemist architecture on a TSMC N6 process is part of why it does more with each watt.
VRAM & Future-Proofing
With 6GB against 4GB, the Arc A380 has more headroom for 4K textures and memory-hungry creative/AI tasks where the GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER's 4GB can fall short.
Generation & Longevity
The Arc A380 is roughly 3 years newer than the GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER (Alchemist vs Turing), so it generally benefits from a more modern architecture and longer driver-support runway.
Features & Ecosystem
Beyond raw numbers, the Arc A380 brings Intel XeSS upscaling and AV1 encoding, while the GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER offers NVIDIA DLSS upscaling/frame generation and stronger ray tracing. If you lean on upscaling or ray tracing, that ecosystem difference can matter as much as the frame-rate gap.
Which should you buy: Arc A380 or GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER?
The GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER is the faster card by about 11%. With live pricing limited for this pair, base your decision on the spec differences above — particularly VRAM and power draw — and check current stock before buying.