GPU Comparison
Select up to 2 GPUs to analyze their pricing, performance, and specifications side-by-side.
The Radeon RX 5700 XT is dramatically faster than the GeForce GTX 1660 Ti, leading by roughly 54% in our performance index. The GeForce GTX 1660 Ti, however, delivers more performance per dollar — $989 cheaper.
Maximum Capacity Reached. Remove a model to add another. (2/2)
Radeon RX 5700 XT vs GeForce GTX 1660 Ti: In-Depth Breakdown
Performance: Radeon RX 5700 XT vs GeForce GTX 1660 Ti
The Radeon RX 5700 XT is dramatically faster, around 54% ahead of the GeForce GTX 1660 Ti. That gap is enough to move it up a tier: the Radeon RX 5700 XT is comfortable at 1080p, while the GeForce GTX 1660 Ti is better matched to entry-level 1080p.
Price & Value
Right now the GeForce GTX 1660 Ti starts at $288 against $1,277 for the Radeon RX 5700 XT. Despite being slower, the GeForce GTX 1660 Ti offers the better performance-per-dollar (~188% better value), so budget-focused buyers should weigh it carefully. The Radeon RX 5700 XT still sits about $878 above its $399 MSRP.
Power & Efficiency
The GeForce GTX 1660 Ti draws just 120W versus 225W for the Radeon RX 5700 XT, and it also delivers more performance per watt — so it runs cooler and quieter and needs less PSU headroom.
VRAM & Future-Proofing
With 8GB against 6GB, the Radeon RX 5700 XT has more headroom for 4K textures and memory-hungry creative/AI tasks where the GeForce GTX 1660 Ti's 6GB can fall short.
Features & Ecosystem
Beyond raw numbers, the GeForce GTX 1660 Ti brings NVIDIA DLSS upscaling/frame generation and stronger ray tracing, while the Radeon RX 5700 XT offers AMD FSR upscaling and strong rasterization value. If you lean on upscaling or ray tracing, that ecosystem difference can matter as much as the frame-rate gap.
Which should you buy: GeForce GTX 1660 Ti or Radeon RX 5700 XT?
Choose the Radeon RX 5700 XT if you want the most performance and can absorb the higher price. If you're optimizing for value, the GeForce GTX 1660 Ti stretches your money further for only slightly lower performance.