GPU Comparison
Select up to 2 GPUs to analyze their pricing, performance, and specifications side-by-side.
The Radeon RX 6500 XT is dramatically faster than the GeForce GTX 1650, leading by roughly 43% in our performance index. The GeForce GTX 1650, however, delivers more performance per dollar — $271 cheaper.
Maximum Capacity Reached. Remove a model to add another. (2/2)
Radeon RX 6500 XT vs GeForce GTX 1650: In-Depth Breakdown
Performance: Radeon RX 6500 XT vs GeForce GTX 1650
The Radeon RX 6500 XT is dramatically faster, around 43% ahead of the GeForce GTX 1650. Both cards sit in the same broad class, well suited to entry-level 1080p.
Price & Value
Right now the GeForce GTX 1650 starts at $256 against $527 for the Radeon RX 6500 XT. Despite being slower, the GeForce GTX 1650 offers the better performance-per-dollar (~44% better value), so budget-focused buyers should weigh it carefully. The GeForce GTX 1650 still sits about $107 above its $149 MSRP. The Radeon RX 6500 XT still sits about $327 above its $200 MSRP.
Power & Efficiency
The GeForce GTX 1650 draws just 75W versus 113W for the Radeon RX 6500 XT, and it also delivers more performance per watt — so it runs cooler and quieter and needs less PSU headroom.
Generation & Longevity
The Radeon RX 6500 XT is roughly 3 years newer than the GeForce GTX 1650, so it generally benefits from a more modern architecture and longer driver-support runway.
Features & Ecosystem
Beyond raw numbers, the GeForce GTX 1650 brings NVIDIA DLSS upscaling/frame generation and stronger ray tracing, while the Radeon RX 6500 XT offers AMD FSR upscaling and strong rasterization value. If you lean on upscaling or ray tracing, that ecosystem difference can matter as much as the frame-rate gap.
Which should you buy: GeForce GTX 1650 or Radeon RX 6500 XT?
Choose the Radeon RX 6500 XT if you want the most performance and can absorb the higher price. If you're optimizing for value, the GeForce GTX 1650 stretches your money further for only slightly lower performance.