GPU Comparison
Select up to 2 GPUs to analyze their pricing, performance, and specifications side-by-side.
The GeForce GTX 1650 is noticeably faster than the Radeon R9 380X, leading by roughly 17% in our performance index.
Maximum Capacity Reached. Remove a model to add another. (2/2)
GeForce GTX 1650 vs Radeon R9 380X: In-Depth Breakdown
Performance: GeForce GTX 1650 vs Radeon R9 380X
The GeForce GTX 1650 is noticeably faster, around 17% ahead of the Radeon R9 380X. Both cards sit in the same broad class, well suited to entry-level 1080p.
Power & Efficiency
The GeForce GTX 1650 draws just 75W versus 190W for the Radeon R9 380X, and it also delivers more performance per watt — so it runs cooler and quieter and needs less PSU headroom.
Generation & Longevity
The GeForce GTX 1650 is roughly 4 years newer than the Radeon R9 380X, so it generally benefits from a more modern architecture and longer driver-support runway.
Features & Ecosystem
Beyond raw numbers, the GeForce GTX 1650 brings NVIDIA DLSS upscaling/frame generation and stronger ray tracing, while the Radeon R9 380X offers AMD FSR upscaling and strong rasterization value. If you lean on upscaling or ray tracing, that ecosystem difference can matter as much as the frame-rate gap.
Which should you buy: GeForce GTX 1650 or Radeon R9 380X?
the GeForce GTX 1650 is the faster card by about 17%. With live pricing limited for this pair, base your decision on the spec differences above — particularly VRAM and power draw — and check current stock before buying.