GPU Comparison
Select up to 2 GPUs to analyze their pricing, performance, and specifications side-by-side.
On raw speed the GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER comes out noticeably faster — about 11% ahead of the Radeon R9 390X.
Maximum Capacity Reached. Remove a model to add another. (2/2)
GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER vs Radeon R9 390X: In-Depth Breakdown
Performance: GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER vs Radeon R9 390X
The GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER is noticeably faster, around 11% ahead of the Radeon R9 390X. Both cards sit in the same broad class, well suited to entry-level 1080p.
Power & Efficiency
At 100W against 275W, the GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER is both the lower-power and the more efficient card, making it the easier build to cool and power.
VRAM & Future-Proofing
The Radeon R9 390X carries 8GB versus 4GB on the GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER. The extra 4GB helps at 4K, with high-resolution texture packs, and for content-creation or local-AI workloads that exhaust smaller buffers.
Generation & Longevity
The GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER is roughly 4 years newer than the Radeon R9 390X, so it generally benefits from a more modern architecture and longer driver-support runway.
Features & Ecosystem
Beyond raw numbers, the Radeon R9 390X brings AMD FSR upscaling and strong rasterization value, while the GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER offers NVIDIA DLSS upscaling/frame generation and stronger ray tracing. If you lean on upscaling or ray tracing, that ecosystem difference can matter as much as the frame-rate gap.
Which should you buy: Radeon R9 390X or GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER?
the GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER is the faster card by about 11%. With live pricing limited for this pair, base your decision on the spec differences above — particularly VRAM and power draw — and check current stock before buying.