GPU Comparison
Select up to 2 GPUs to analyze their pricing, performance, and specifications side-by-side.
The GeForce RTX 3050 is dramatically faster than the Arc A310, leading by roughly 160% in our performance index. It is also the stronger value pick here, so it's the easy recommendation if your budget allows.
Maximum Capacity Reached. Remove a model to add another. (2/2)
GeForce RTX 3050 vs Arc A310: In-Depth Breakdown
Performance: GeForce RTX 3050 vs Arc A310
The GeForce RTX 3050 is dramatically faster, around 160% ahead of the Arc A310. Both cards sit in the same broad class, well suited to entry-level 1080p.
Price & Value
Right now the Arc A310 starts at $196 against $340 for the GeForce RTX 3050. Because it's both faster and competitively priced, the GeForce RTX 3050 wins on performance-per-dollar by about 50%. The GeForce RTX 3050 still sits about $91 above its $249 MSRP.
Power & Efficiency
The Arc A310 draws just 30W versus 130W for the GeForce RTX 3050, and it also delivers more performance per watt — so it runs cooler and quieter and needs less PSU headroom.
Features & Ecosystem
Beyond raw numbers, the GeForce RTX 3050 brings NVIDIA DLSS upscaling/frame generation and stronger ray tracing, while the Arc A310 offers Intel XeSS upscaling and AV1 encoding. If you lean on upscaling or ray tracing, that ecosystem difference can matter as much as the frame-rate gap.
Which should you buy: GeForce RTX 3050 or Arc A310?
the GeForce RTX 3050 is the all-round winner here — it's faster and the better value, so buy it if it fits your budget. Only consider the Arc A310 if you find it at a steep discount.